• KOL
    • Facet Arthropathy
    • The Reliability Of...
    • The Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading of Lumbar Facet Arthropathy in Total Disc Replacement Patients: Influence Statistics

      Expert Impact

      Concepts for whichthey havehas direct influence:Facet arthropathy,Computed tomography,Lumbar facet,Magnetic resonance,Resonance imaging,Facet disease,Grading facet,Intervertebral disc.

      Key People For Facet Arthropathy

      Top KOLs in the world
      #1
      Juerg Hodler
      magnetic resonance rotator cuff morton neuroma
      #2
      Norbert Boos
      intervertebral disc lumbar spine cell density
      #3
      Nikolai Bogduk
      neck pain diagnostic blocks zygapophysial joint
      #4
      Marco Zanetti
      magnetic resonance rotator cuff morton neuroma
      #5
      Dominik Weishaupt
      magnetic resonance pelvic floor morton neuroma
      #6
      Howard S An
      disc degeneration nucleus pulposus cervical spine

      The Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading of Lumbar Facet Arthropathy in Total Disc Replacement Patients

      Abstract

      STUDY DESIGN: Prospective inter-rater and intrarater reliability analysis.

      OBJECTIVE: To compare the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for grading of facet arthropathy as well as determining whether there is a contraindication to total disc replacement (TDR).

      SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several classifications attempted to evaluate lumbar facet joints and their degree of arthropathy. The Fujiwara-MRI and Pathrea-CT classifications remain the most commonly used.

      METHODS: A total of 10 fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeons and 3 orthopedic spine fellows evaluated 50 levels from L3-L4 through L5-S1 on parallel axial MRI (T1 and T2) and CT images. The degree of osteoarthritis was graded on a 4-point scale (Fujiwara-MRI and Pathrea-CT). Surgeons evaluated whether the degree of facet disease represented a contraindication to TDR. Grading was performed during 2 sessions. Weighted kappa statistics were used to describe inter- and intraobserver agreement.

      RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for MRI was 0.21 and 0.07 (fair to slight) among attendings and fellows, respectively. inter-rater reliability for CT was 0.33 and 0.27 (fair), respectively. The mean intrarater reliability for MRI was fair, 0.36 (attendings) and 0.26 (fellows). The mean intrarater reliability for CT was moderate, 0.52 (attendings) and 0.51 (fellows). For possible TDR contraindication, the inter-rater reliability for MRI was 0.22 and 0.01 (fair to slight) among attendings and fellows, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for CT was 0.33 and 0.45 (fair), respectively. The mean intrarater reliability for MRI was fair, 0.36 (attendings) and 0.26 (fellows). The mean intrarater reliability for CT was moderate, 0.52 (attendings) and 0.51 (fellows).

      CONCLUSION: The current grading system for facet arthropathy has only fair agreement. CT is slightly more reliable for grading. Intrarater reliability was only fair for MRI and moderate for CT. Only limited agreement existed between surgeons as to the extent of facet disease that would pose as a contraindication for TDR.

      Sign-in to see all concepts, it's free!

       

    Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

    Copyright © 2023 Key Opinion Leaders, LLC.