• KOL
    • Nfs Scs
    • Intra- And...
    • Intra- and Intersubspecialty Variability in Lumbar Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multireader Study Comparing Musculoskeletal Radiologists and Neuroradiologists: Influence Statistics

      Expert Impact

      Concepts for whichthey havehas direct influence:Nfs scs,Lumbar spine,Spine mri,Single institution,Stenosis nfs,Stenosis scs,Neural foraminal stenosis,Spinal stenosis.

      Key People For Nfs Scs

      Top KOLs in the world
      #1
      Jeffrey Neil Katz
      rheumatoid arthritis meniscal tear united states
      #2
      Anna N Angelos Tosteson
      breast cancer united states digital mammography
      #3
      Tor Devin Tosteson
      spinal stenosis task force degenerative spondylolisthesis
      #4
      James Neal Weinstein
      spinal stenosis degenerative spondylolisthesis nonoperative treatment
      #5
      John A Carrino
      magnetic resonance task force chronic low
      #6
      Eugene J Carragee
      neck pain task force evidence synthesis
      Select a search phrase   nfs scs

      Intra- and Intersubspecialty Variability in Lumbar Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multireader Study Comparing Musculoskeletal Radiologists and Neuroradiologists

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the differences in degenerative spine MRI reporting between subspecialty-trained attending neuroradiologists and musculoskeletal radiologists (MSK) at a single institution, academic medical center.

      MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive outpatient noncontrast lumbar spine examinations were selected from the Picture Archiving and Communication System. Three MSK and 3 neuroradiologists (NR) independently reviewed and interpreted the exams at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels in the same manner as in clinical practice. The assessment of neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) and spinal canal stenosis (SCS) was converted to a 5-point ordinal scale. The assessment of lateral recess stenosis (LRS) and facet osteoarthritis (FO) was recorded as present/absent. Intersubspecialty and intrasubspecialty analysis was performed using Cohen's kappa coefficient with a binary matrix of all reader pairs.

      RESULTS: There was moderate intersubspecialty agreement (k = 0.527) for NFS and SCS (k = 0.540). Intersubspecialty agreement was slight for LRS (k = 0.0818) and FO (k = 0.176). The MSK group demonstrated greater intrasubspecialty agreement in assessment of NFS and SCS compared to the NR group, with nonoverlapping confidence intervals. The NR group demonstrated greater nominal intrasubspecialty agreement in the assessment of both LRS and FO, although with nonoverlapping confidence intervals.

      CONCLUSION: There is moderate intersubspecialty agreement between MSK radiologists and neuroradiologists in reporting the severity of NFS and SCS, although MSK radiologists demonstrated greater intrasubspecialty agreement. There is slight intersubspecialty agreement for LRS and FO. The demonstration of differences in inter-reader agreement is a crucial first step to attempt to ameliorate these variabilities.

      Sign-in to see all concepts, it's free!

       

    Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

    Copyright © 2023 Key Opinion Leaders, LLC.