Staphylococcus Aureus and Intra‐nasal Mupirocin in Patients Receiving Isotretinoin for Acne

touch_app Click to see the full documentopen_in_new
Authors: RONA M M MacKieTom C AitchisonValerie R DohertyRichard EA WilliamsW PERKINS
Year: 1992
Times cited: 27

Key People For Staphylococcus Aureus

Top KOLs in the world
Barry N Kreiswirth
mycobacterium tuberculosis staphylococcus aureus new york city
François Vandenesch
staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis septic shock
Richard P Novick
staphylococcus aureus plasmid replication bacterial genes
Timothy J Foster
staphylococcus aureus clumping factor binding protein
Jerome Etienne
staphylococcus aureus legionella pneumophila infective endocarditis
Fred C Tenover
united states staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance

Staphylococcus aureus and intra‐nasal mupirocin in patients receiving isotretinoin for acne


Thirty patients commencing isotretinoin for acne were entered into a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of pulsed intra-nasal mupirocin ointment on Staphylococcus aureus colonization and isotretinoin-related side-effects. In both mupirocin and placebo groups there was an increase in isolation of S. aureus throughout the period of treatment with isotretinoin from the anterior nares, facial skin and lips. However, these increases were significantly less in the mupirocin-treated group. A high proportion of all patients suffered inflammatory side-effects of isotretinoin such as cheilitis and nasal vestibulitis, with their maximum severities being recorded 2 months after starting isotretinoin. In spite of the smaller increase in S. aureus colonization in the mupirocin-treated group no difference was demonstrated in either the incidence of specific S. aureus infections (e.g. furunculosis) or the prevalence of isotretinoin-related inflammatory side-effects. Furthermore, no relationship between the presence of S. aureus and the severity of inflammatory side-effects was shown. Streptococcus species were isolated on four separate occasions from four different patients during the study but their pathogenicity was unclear. These findings suggest that although pulsed intra-nasal mupirocin produces a significant reduction in isotretinoin-related staphylococcal colonization, its routine use cannot be justified on the basis of clinical benefit.

to see all concepts, it's free!

FREE Custom List