Title:

The Effect of Walking Aids on Balance and Weight-Bearing Patterns of Patients With Hemiparesis in Various Stance Positions



touch_app Click to see the full documentopen_in_new
Authors: Yocheved Laufer
Year: 2003
Times cited: 51

Key People For Walking Aids

Top KOLs in the world
#1
Brian Edward Maki
compensatory stepping postural balance handrail height
#2
Hamid Bateni
compensatory grasping physical therapy assistive devices
#3
Marshal F Folstein
alzheimer disease nursing homes cognitive impairment
#4
Susan E Folstein
huntingtons disease autistic individuals hd patients
#5
Paul R McHugh
gastric emptying food intake rhesus monkeys
#6
Stephen Ronald Lord
older people fall risk multiple sclerosis

The Effect of Walking Aids on Balance and Weight-Bearing Patterns of Patients With Hemiparesis in Various Stance Positions

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Standard and quad canes are often prescribed to patients with hemiparesis, yet their effect on postural control remains unclear. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the effects of standard and quad canes on postural sway and on weight-bearing patterns in patients with hemiparesis.

SUBJECTS: Thirty subjects with a diagnosis of unilateral hemiparesis following a stroke (patient group; mean age=71.2 years, SD=7.0) and 20 age-matched, community-dwelling volunteers without hemiparesis (comparison group; mean age=72.1 years, SD=5.2) participated in the study.

METHODS: Postural sway and percentage of body weight (%BW) borne by each extremity were measured in 3 positions: with the heels aligned with each other (aligned position) and in staggered foot positions with either the affected or unaffected extremity placed forward (affected FW and unaffected FW positions). All subjects were tested in each position with no cane, a standard cane, and a quad cane. The order of tests was randomized, and analysis of data included use of an analysis of variance and adjusted Tukey-Kramer tests.

RESULTS: In both the aligned and unaffected FW positions, postural sway was reduced only with the quad cane. Both types of canes reduced postural sway in the affected FW position; however, the quad cane had a greater effect. An asymmetrical weight distribution between the lower extremities did not change in the patient group across positions, even with walking aids.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A quad cane appears to be more effective than a standard cane in decreasing postural sway in patients with moderate impairment secondary to hemiparesis during stance. The greatest effect on postural sway occurred when the assistive device was contralateral to the foot placed forward. The use of a cane does not appear to adversely affect the asymmetrical weight-bearing pattern during stance that is characteristic of patients with hemiparesis, even when balance is challenged by decreasing the base of support.

Sign-in to see all concepts, it's free!

download
FREE Custom List